- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
發表於 2025-1-4 02:48:33
|
顯示全部樓層
Mohamed El Kholy , Rasha Tarif Hamza * , Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy2 i' r; D$ k' _/ }- ^% \% Y" [
Penile length and genital anomalies in Egyptian
( n8 q5 O0 U7 o0 o' F4 l# q# J' hmale newborns: epidemiology and influence of
. Z. k: f' q4 z; nendocrine disruptors% j- g' @) w, ]
Abstract: This is an attempt to establish the normal
1 ^' C7 q/ O" m F. e/ [% Astretched penile length and prevalence of male geni-
( |' ~& o# _$ l$ ztal anomalies in full-term neonates and whether they" t& Z9 O9 B F9 l5 T
are influenced by prenatal parental exposure to endo-, w. d- G- @2 P# S6 Q
crine-disrupting chemicals. A thousand newborns were
5 _) ~; y* S2 T6 o% }included; their mothers were subjected to the following `* C2 ~6 f5 x# Y9 B z4 ]
questionnaire: parents ’ age, residence, occupation, con-$ b! Q+ x- X$ T( U& k' d; h) M
tact with insecticides and pesticides, antenatal exposure
7 t5 K9 H4 V2 ^& J; Yto cigarette smoke or drugs, family history of genital# D$ T+ s C# Q) @; G
anomalies, phytoestrogens intake and history of in vitro
8 Q* _) Y" E6 P8 _' `5 B: C/ Ofertilization or infertility. Free testosterone was measured9 Z# T0 ?5 v3 n5 }
in 150 neonates in the first day of life. Mean penile length
# E7 S$ j6 D# l2 v* Jwas 3.4 ± 0.37 cm. A penile length < 2.5 cm was considered
2 o Z8 E% X5 Z! @" n7 O4 [ m( _micropenis. Prevalence of genital anomalies was 1.8 %
7 `1 I2 P4 F/ e2 D(hypospadias 83.33 % ). There was a higher rate of anoma-
& [" p( H d) E6 ^1 blies in those exposed to endocrine disruptors (EDs; 7.4 % )
4 g8 p7 y7 n) e5 x& ~- ~6 Zthan in the non-exposed (1.2 % ; p < 0.0001; odds ratio 6,
. q! W7 h3 ?8 {7 ~ B95 % confidence interval 2 – 16). Mean penile length showed
& i. f3 j/ k i% h$ Ta linear relationship with free testosterone and was lower
2 J3 n% b; ^$ M1 Rin neonates exposed to EDs.
1 B+ T8 ?4 s3 t3 h9 ~! w) h! {Keywords: endocrine disruptors; genital anomalies; male;
C0 P* [$ D# S2 Mpenile length; testosterone.+ q6 }/ o c7 i. o, [$ C" _
*Corresponding author : Rasha Tarif Hamza, MD, Faculty of+ |6 y5 a/ i8 J8 ^( F! m
Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, 361 E% Q6 q1 I$ r+ n$ F, r
Hisham Labib Street, off Makram Ebeid Street, Nasr City, Cairo1 }% S: R7 C0 Z9 q0 P
11371, Cairo, Egypt, Phone: + 20-2-22734727, Fax: + 20-2-26904430 ,% M9 F A+ u, y
E-mail: [email protected]
9 _" G. F7 V+ E% O0 r1 g$ u, A! [Mohamed El Kholy, Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy: Faculty of
1 c8 a9 S' h' p3 p" yMedicine , Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, Cairo,
3 X; P- j/ F5 k5 NEgypt
; k- _* F4 f) F% D- h0 M+ p TIntroduction: F7 t1 M( p4 u
Determination of penile size is employed clinically in
% D2 }. ]9 t% d, u; f' \the evaluation of children with abnormal genital devel-) m4 L. N4 A k' m6 w7 Z# {& N
opment, such as, for example, micropenis, defined as a
8 A8 }8 N) O$ A: Gpenis that is normal in terms of shape and function, but is
3 l7 O; T8 z4 C k) Tmore than 2.5 standard deviations (SD) smaller than mean
( _; x8 g/ x- Q% v! ]size in terms of length (1) . However, these measurements$ t2 l- f5 t9 U
can be subject to significant international variations, in: J$ i7 W/ c' R/ @$ A& ]% N5 l
addition to being obtained with different methodologies( t; U" n* M8 y) \/ j+ `! P; Y* `
in some cases (2) .) |/ p9 F8 |9 A o+ e8 z+ E P" a) f
Over the past 20 years, the documented increase in
) u2 ]! J) ~6 L- ]8 odisorders of male sexual differentiation, such as hypo-
, s' b" X7 @% u7 o3 a: ?( c$ Ispadias, cryptorchidism, and micropenis, has led to the; Z; {7 G$ v; U# L' A7 V
suspicion that environmental chemicals are detrimental" C; ~0 ]# t" j( n1 x& @! T
to normal male genital development in utero (3) . The so-* |4 L1 m2 B- j1 n5 w, m
called Sharpe-Skakkebaek hypothesis offered a possible) h& [& \: Y! `1 S- u8 i' E
common cause and toxicological mechanism for abnor-+ N: b1 b% }; u: L
malities in men and boys – that is, increased exposure to5 K+ }: \0 s( Q$ ] V
oestrogen in utero may interfere with the multiplication
+ J. e+ O4 Z' e7 s1 bof fetal Sertoli cells, resulting in hormonally mediated2 ]' s. h/ n7 n+ |" D
developmental effects and, after puberty, reduced quality, C6 h) r( F# }* @: E
of semen (4) .
# R/ ?* g, t g/ v" hIt has been proposed that these disorders are part of
' U: W) U% j7 ca single common underlying entity known as the testicu-
0 _1 C3 _& W5 i& T$ p: ylar dysgenesis syndrome (TDS) (5) . TDS comprises various
- z. {( ^3 y; {' [0 saspects of impaired gonadal development and function,6 d: p# H6 [/ X4 x, R1 q
including abnormal spermatogenesis, cryptorchidism,4 P* e+ j# i0 b
hypospadias, and testicular cancer (6) .3 b6 k7 e' y6 W8 F& C: f
The etiological basis for this condition is complex' C$ Q, P: N; { U
and is thought to be due to a combination of both genetic+ x& N F% A- D, E; O4 j3 ?. f
and environmental factors that result in the disruption
7 Z+ U& ]9 \ e& G" t' cof normal gonadal development during fetal life. First,
( q7 [' g2 c! F* }0 p/ Mit was proposed that environmental chemicals with oes-$ n$ q2 d, [: a W5 s+ j
trogen-like actions could have adverse effects on male: y5 V; Q$ b& a5 E; B! M
gonadal development. This has since been expanded to
7 @2 Z$ j: P, B; r7 Qinclude environmental chemicals with anti-androgen
' |/ O! E0 c4 J J: i8 ]actions and it is now thought that an imbalance between# w4 K* F% t/ i3 E6 ]' I; F) n
androgen and oestrogen activity is the key mechanism by9 S! w& E& {, b2 b6 U, M& [
which exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs)
, R" H8 ?# s; D( M% [) K! K, Y1 hresults in the development of TDS and male reproductive
( T# a1 t6 y% w$ F/ H Ptract abnormalities (5) .1 y5 x/ m; }1 r5 g" J, b
With the increasing use of environmental chemicals,9 H3 F1 J5 O& _! b/ Y
an attempt was made to establish the normal stretched9 l( ]# j, S; m& p4 O7 \
penile length as well as the prevalence of male genital) j& t* p/ {+ d8 Q |# g$ P
anomalies in full-term neonates and whether there is an
( `8 ~4 ^4 l( Y3 b- t3 r) r9 Uinfluence of prenatal parental exposure to potential EDCs
( l) e. S/ u! @3 C/ ]& a! G, Qon these parameters.
+ n. L6 g3 @+ ^1 h4 jBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
7 j' o) B& `. q- ~Authenticated% ^: x# ]% q$ R/ b# v( P+ C
Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM. X3 r3 j1 L4 E) _' P- X4 L
510 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies
" ^. }/ j1 U/ n5 F$ C; K, C8 X/ rSubjects and methods2 S; p7 m- b$ f, H# R
Study population9 y2 c( C2 H; U& j
The study was conducted as a prospective cohort study at the Univer-" F1 T& J" {# x/ D
sity Hospital of Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. A sample of 10002 _3 } {# ^- D* Z0 g3 _( v0 p6 H
male full-term newborns was studied. T2 a- @2 C+ K, a( j1 y% `
Sampling technique7 I' d4 P" m% `6 }3 R( l
Three days per week were selected randomly out of 7 days. In each
1 C+ Y2 _/ ^& @day, all male full-term deliveries were selected during the time of fi eld
$ ?5 f5 L3 T# U; g9 kstudy (12 h) during the period from March 2007 to November 2007.
* Y2 r* z7 {8 K1 A T0 rStatistical analysis
, W3 G+ a) `: U: R# XThe computer program SPSS for Windows release 11.0 (SPSS Inc.,
$ _3 D& D! `% ?* \' |" n+ RChicago, IL, USA) was used for data entry and analysis. All numeric
" o% O" A2 p) \6 Lvariables were expressed as mean ± SD. Comparison of diff erent vari-- C1 t# R1 N7 \' @2 y) v, Q
ables between two groups was done using the Student ’ s t-test for
. V H. C% Q# L% `: Q7 q& @normally distributed variables. Comparisons of multiple groups were
' P! J+ F6 I( ^3 P5 F+ J' _done using analysis of variance and post hoc tests for normally dis-
, q/ `$ w; @. A0 n7 i, E5 O% G- B; u6 ntributed variables. The χ 2 -test was used to compare the frequency of% a# o5 B& Q. R& [/ T
qualitative variables among the diff erent groups; the Fisher exact test# _1 u8 p, [/ p. V8 T$ E$ w
was performed in tables containing values < 5. The Pearson correla-: U: E# ^& V( o: o3 {
tion test was used for correlating various variables. For all tests, a
+ C- h7 z, x' d9 ~4 }( Iprobability (p) < 0.05 was considered signifi cant (10) .
/ u v' C3 H% i! {2 D ^4 aResults
7 g) e+ I0 u7 f; O; aData collected1 c7 {' H, x! N3 s# E
A researcher completed a structured questionnaire during inter-
- b# e1 _& N+ Q- Xviews with the mothers. The questionnaire gathered information
0 ?8 N8 w9 f- E6 E, e5 M' fon the following: age of parents; residence; occupation of the
- E: M# a( j- s( j6 N. ?& }. Qparents; contact with insecticides and pesticides and their type and; W2 ]; o3 F0 o! p, I! T8 r1 ]
frequency of contact; maternal exposure to cigarette smoke during
* H$ A5 S: `9 o+ Y2 apregnancy; maternal drug history during gestation; family history x7 E* r$ N0 \
of hypospadias, cryptorchidism, or other congenital anomalies; in-8 m/ \6 j k0 g8 \6 p/ v
take of foods containing phytoestrogens, e.g., soy beans, olive oil,) a g c) J3 p6 d( i+ l0 @: h
garlic, hummus, sesame seed, and their frequency; and, also, his-* y8 _9 V8 O8 ^, J2 |# f! l( x$ y, Z
tory of in vitro fertilization or infertility (type of infertility and drugs
# k: x r/ D" s; S" `given).
2 D. S- x" z' W' _6 S- MEnvironmental exposure to chemicals was evaluated for its po-
6 X( ^: v( K0 Y) F9 I# h1 Etential of causing endocrine disruption. Chemicals were classifi ed
6 G8 I( B& v! s q" U- dinto two groups on the basis of scientifi c evidence for their having+ I3 B" o2 l, L8 v) P& M
endocrine-disrupting properties: group I: evidence of endocrine dis-; u; N! w* V' @) E4 i! p1 b0 E& ~
ruption high and medium exposure concern; group II: no evidence of
. K7 B" S+ b mendocrine disruption and low exposure concern (7) . N: k/ E" }0 S, S
Descriptive data; }, n. ^( X5 {+ H# I- f
The mean age of newborns ’ fathers was 36 ± 6 years (range
3 c! t. A9 R+ I" u6 ]6 f8 b20 – 50 years) and that of mothers was 26 ± 5 years (range
+ _8 ?. i% r; Q1 P; W# f. f" y S19 – 42 years). Exposure to EDs started long before preg-
; ]/ ~5 u2 C: X& q# }' U" Rnancy and continued throughout pregnancy. Regard-
: H3 u Q2 U4 H" wing therapeutic history during pregnancy, 99 mothers+ E: p+ a4 N& z* i; ~
(9.9 % ) received progestins, 14 (1.4 % ) received insulin,
; q' H+ l4 R! t2 A6 (0.6 % ) received heparin, 4 (0.04 % ) received long-8 r- B s7 t9 R9 _1 @2 b9 G* z
acting penicillin, 3 (0.3 % ) received aspirin, 2 (0.2 % )
2 l1 S) @# [5 g1 P6 `received B2 agonist, and 1 (0.1 % ) received thyroxin,% ~! r3 ~" G$ } z) Z
while the rest did not receive any medications during
" {5 i( S' v3 |2 |2 Upregnancy except for the known multivitamins and
: t# z3 c) N* C+ ~calcium supplementations. In addition, family history( x. s' q4 a- x4 Y4 C, V$ b
of newborns born small for gestational age was positive/ B( p. D2 \# Z! B9 _4 s6 n' J
in 21 cases (2.1 % ).0 v) P. y' K* s3 H3 ?* |1 e) M7 k; y: }
Examination
2 h" Y7 Z7 A# n0 |) hIn addition to the full examination by the paediatric staff , each boy
7 C" B( A- k, G1 Twas examined for anomalies of the external genitalia during the
* O4 d1 b8 \7 k Dfi rst 24 h of life by one specially trained researcher. Examination( }; J9 k( y: U& B
of the genital system included measurement of stretched penile
' X2 Z4 N% t1 Z* Mlength (8) and examination of external genitalia for congenital* g2 `" d9 H& W3 g$ \" ?6 V
anomalies such as cryptorchidism (9) and hypospadias. Hypospa-
4 E! w' p# C- Z" `' d ldias was graded as not glanular, coronal, penile, penoscrotal, scro-( T4 T1 @; N f+ x1 I
tal, or perineal according to the anatomical position. Cases of iso-
/ O) S" Q: x/ i5 ?9 ?4 z& i* ~# e+ Wlated malformed foreskin without hypospadias were not included% A. k+ e( L9 _3 R* ?: A
as cases./ r* s0 C7 b4 p
Penile length
0 _3 u7 b' j: T; x& Y) a# a* _Laboratory investigations
9 t: t; U+ M4 OFree testosterone level was measured in 150 randomly chosen neo- |' v1 z, _+ z$ r0 D2 K+ a
nates from the studied sample in the fi rst day of life (enzyme im-: M2 S: k- w! r& ?7 g
munoassay test supplied by Diagnostics Biochem Canada, Inc.,- b' r. G( |" n+ x }& t7 e+ T
Dorchester, Ontario, Canada)./ y; n; H- @. E+ D3 G
Mean penile length was 3.41 ± 0.37 cm (range 2.4 – 4.6 cm).
" _0 Q( [- ~8 e5 i- {- F0 u& oA penile length < 2.5 cm was considered micropenis ( < the
/ i& z4 c7 w7 l2 m; @mean by 2.5 SD). Two cases (0.2 % ) were considered to6 H7 |6 r1 b5 Q4 H& _& z
have micropenis. Mean penile length was lower (p = 0.041)( ]& }9 \+ K- T3 D& d" Z& D% D
in neonates exposed to EDs (n = 81, 3.1 cm) compared to the
9 I H7 Y; V* _( unon-exposed group (n = 919, 3.4 cm; Figure 1 ).
1 Q% C4 g. V9 z [# j2 IThere was a linear relationship between penile length
. _7 q2 c- I; I) Y! H3 W; v: j9 Band the length of the newborn with a regression coef-
H1 r7 c$ q7 U6 Aficient of 0.05 (95 % CI 0.04 – 0.06; p < 0.0001), i.e., there- n; ?3 H4 b+ n- R
was an increase of 0.05 cm for each unit increase in length
6 f X/ M- e9 `4 V8 u$ m(cm). Similarly, there was a linear relationship between& g$ j" e9 X( J2 S
penile length and the weight of the newborn with a regres-
$ U. c/ v, o- z }, a e) |; }sion coefficient of 0.14 (95 % CI 0.09 – 0.18; p < 0.0001), i.e.,8 ]& N/ G7 v' {6 s6 k8 ^/ N3 i1 q
there was an increase of 0.14 cm for each unit increase in
+ X; |! ?( I8 |+ {5 H% ^* N ^5 fweight (kg).. `7 d/ x2 j" W7 [! z. B! R
Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco4 z8 e# W8 ~9 u
Authenticated
) q: d" D/ G) YDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM g1 k. B2 O9 N- J
El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 511
7 |) u. z+ Y+ x2 p! M/ d3 `3.454 c* D, T7 j; u5 p' _- G8 Y
3.404 Y+ r2 @6 C' z! l
3.35( L: B8 P0 Z% O0 B {
3.30; z" a) E9 Q1 A$ I; `
3.25
% s6 O. \2 _) V) f+ F3.20
* y; p: u* }5 _8 O9 [. z" W3.15
% _% t% b6 z7 h" n O$ B3.10& U+ P, f, _+ O; Y! H
3.05
; g1 C# A1 z n, @9 L1 T3.00
( k( O- W8 I) h* ^* W2.95, G! F2 v R) J, g0 r
2.90
* f) Y& }9 q6 }; u! u$ K7 a! `; aMean# L( J$ x# t' r& r- d% ~/ K: v
penile
) P& \/ [2 Q2 L8 Q2 n# [$ tlength4 p- S9 k* E5 N' \8 ]) N' n n) Q. @
an odds ratio of 6 (95 % CI 2 – 16), i.e., the exposed persons
' G: A Q* ~: u. ]3 D* Ewere six times more likely to develop anomalies than
( E* f4 ?, y1 l) d$ Lthose not exposed (Table 1 ).1 e2 v/ X* o3 e5 r! A
Genital anomalies were detected in the offspring
5 [" Y- A; v+ P# `! sof those exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons (9.52 % ),+ B2 E- Y; J; i# b9 Q; N
phthalate esters (8.70 % ), and heavy metals (6.25 % ). In0 E1 x$ l' b2 o7 B
contrast, none of the newborns exposed to phenols had
- `2 H; p/ b4 ]7 i( B1 B) agenital anomalies (Table 2 )., O" } K$ }9 T1 ^ `1 w) a) P
Exposed8 T4 M/ ]) g. J7 u+ G- {4 \
Non exposed
6 v) J& r% l+ HPenile lengths according to exposure to endocrine
; K) x" r7 N' O6 h( zFigure 1 disruptors." Y; ]( B8 H: y. x& v
Serum free testosterone levels
P( y+ s8 P/ Z7 G R& ZExposure to cigarette smoke and progestins
- S+ C$ l M5 l8 K; \during the first trimester
2 `( p1 [) n+ q7 `! i ]None of the mothers in the study was an active smoker;
`: X* j7 G& M" \350 were only exposed through passive smoking. There! c+ y/ d+ c6 l
was no difference between rates of anomalies among
; ~; o4 ^ f* w- Athose exposed to cigarette smoke when compared to those* \/ J5 ^7 l" |
not exposed (1.1 % vs. 2.2 % ). Similarly, there was no differ- J* c( M7 i1 r3 Z0 R; H3 L
ence between the rates of anomalies among those exposed9 j2 u2 h R; b* r2 _- X7 s
to progestins during the first trimester when compared to
: q$ \, b: B( I9 r$ S' Qthe non-exposed ones (2 % vs. 1.8 % ).3 C$ ~! z) {2 G# A) j
In the first day of life, serum free testosterone levels
; u a h0 ?5 {, P+ F7 k, h5 @' Pranged between 7.2 and 151 pg/mL (mean 61.9 ± 38.4 pg/mL;8 Q/ D/ L7 o) \* N3 |
median 60 pg/mL). There was a linear relationship
) {0 e- d. h# pbetween penile length and testosterone level of the
! S: |0 M, l+ y' Z# i' X1 }newborn with a regression coefficient of 0.002 (95 % CI
6 j3 O4 `2 y" R. E4 O0.0004 – 0.003; p = 0.01), i.e., there was an increase of 0.2 cm
4 ^* `4 i$ X7 S$ ]! Q2 Win penile length per 100 pg/mL increase in testosterone& X: p7 j- j( S' @7 T
level. Moreover, serum testosterone level was significantly4 g4 k" R3 ^& l' u" f( z
lower in newborns exposed to EDs (49.50 ± 22.3 pg/mL)! t* N* W# Z5 K8 H0 w
than in the non-exposed group (72.20 ± 31.20 pg/mL;# h% \ Y3 X3 B9 [( A. y. w: s
p < 0.01).9 `; @% g( \8 O! C/ Y9 ?1 W8 X* m3 @0 }/ q( F
Table 1 Frequency of genital anomalies according to type of
2 G7 l5 w5 m2 ]# {( @1 Y2 uexposure to endocrine disruptors.
- x: i+ a- w$ LExposure to endocrine
; w$ J8 k( R' r2 w" pdisruptors# U5 B7 n7 S4 E& m
Prevalence of genital anomalies
' e: A5 u! L. wAnomalies Total8 O+ g0 K9 O7 [, l1 i, [. k
Negative Positive& A! {6 O3 n9 @+ q
Negative exposure 908 11 919
} E& M. |8 b- G& V98.8 % 1.2 % 100.0 %
! V, I0 H! E1 h- BPositive exposure 75 6 81
9 s9 q. w9 B% T. X92.6 % 7.4 % 100.0 %( J* S, _, _9 G' @
Total 983 17 1000
. t& c2 z' a/ \/ n) e/ m' W98.3 % 1.7 % 100.0 %; r+ w9 \: F" ?3 c3 f; i
χ 2 = 25.05, p < 0.0001.
% M( O# r- t3 @- @Over the study period, the birth prevalence of genital
7 [" `+ y+ b9 {' ^# {) danomalies was 1.8 % , i.e., 18/1000 live birth. Hypospadias
' h. Y5 g0 Y' y; Y2 Gaccounted for 83.33 % of the cases. Fourteen had glanu-
, }$ `! E5 X0 p% S* o/ Z! qlar hypospadias and one had coronal hypospadias. One
- ^$ d' C, V: J/ p3 Vhad penile torsion and another had penile chordee. Right-- l' Q3 Q( m' J5 d+ Z% {. |
sided cryptorchidism was present in one newborn.
' P7 v0 V. W8 ?# _Exposure to EDCs+ o1 t7 d( f1 ~ O/ H; M! H
Among the whole sample, 81 newborns (8.10 % ) were
9 Z- D6 g" B# x% Y& z1 E Mexposed to EDs. The duration of exposure varied from3 J" ~9 P/ C; J, R9 K" u
2 to 32 years with a frequency of exposure ranging from! F6 ` I! d" J( g# ^! A
weekly to 2 – 3 months per year. f# ~1 h) m S
There was a significantly higher rate of anomalies4 c" ]2 \! |, J2 D2 x* c
among those who were exposed to EDs when compared+ R `; p' t, Y
to non-exposed newborns (7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ; p < 0.0001), with. x1 e; y) \+ G$ n
Table 2 Type of endocrine disruptor and percentage of anomalies in8 Q5 A; m$ w; a2 X: m t
the group of neonates exposed to endocrine disruptors (n = 81).
% z Z& {/ G2 ~' S. f. i" E4 TAnomalies Total' G2 T1 F/ N9 I8 g$ ]
Negative Positive
( {9 j3 f3 l! c# [7 d4 g1 j2 a- u% t( jChlorinated hydrocarbons (farmers) 19 2 21
7 j( V1 }1 Y, }+ z0 _& d: \90.48 % 9.52 % 100.0 %
( [* g) v; y3 U+ x" xHeavy metals (iron smiths, welders) 30 2 32+ ^. X" a! X. c) P% u$ [
93.75 % 6.25 % 100.0 %6 v. z a, U7 {5 {
Phthalate esters (house painters) 21 2 23. j6 r; J" T* E) r
91.30 % 8.70 % 100.0 %" b) `9 P, R$ ]; x. X$ F5 L6 J
Phenols (car mechanics) 5 0 5
& z: W8 A, T2 h( h! A- G100.0 % 0 % 100.0 %
! B6 x( ^3 F5 X$ t( T. M8 HTotal 75 6 816 K5 I0 {3 H0 G# |8 E3 U/ k6 a
92.60 % 7.40 % 100.0 %% m' D# i9 T3 F) k( E
Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco5 ]: [+ T: f0 O7 v Q' D4 y$ @4 s5 _
Authenticated
( V" L! G. V9 _0 }5 [Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM- K4 H/ l8 }2 f' e3 e9 k
512 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies7 p% v9 e; O- n E" c
Discussion" U2 m m- y" \6 ~( {- j# L
Previously reported penile lengths varied from 2.86 to 3.75 cm% u5 ?# _4 l4 _) `( s) V$ a
(11 – 16) and depended on ethnicity. In Saudi Arabia (13) ," W }8 V: d P6 W8 Y
mean newborn penile length was 3.55 ± 0.57 cm, slightly+ `3 n9 ]' K4 \0 n
higher than our mean value. However, the cut-off lower! m+ o( O% |6 x) k/ }( z* _' c
limit ( – 2.5 SD) was calculated to be 2.13 cm (vs. 2.5 cm in# f# Z0 I* n; ^; c
our cohort). This emphasizes the importance of establish-. p2 r& s! h) K3 _0 z/ q. v
ing the normal values for each country because the normal: o( _" R9 A' m7 l. S8 i
range could vary markedly. In a multiethnic community,
9 I6 k2 A% Y, P6 e* W: T& e: ia mean length of – 2.5 SD was used for the definition of
; _0 M$ t' o4 F8 H- d, amicropenis and was 2.6, 2.5, and 2.3 cm for Caucasian,
: ~4 e2 g6 `) O' GEast-Indian, and Chinese babies, respectively (p < 0.05).
( k; h5 K& N; H0 i; X" o% VThis is close to the widely accepted recommendation that
! {. M6 S# x2 P5 P5 aa penile length of 2.4 – 2.5 cm be considered as the lowest0 G" F( P9 }" z; H3 |( z
limit for the definition of micropenis (8) . The recognition
: I$ j; S# B& D& y7 dof micropenis is important, because it might be the only) u$ ]3 y6 z p: M# f0 X
obvious manifestation of pituitary or hypothalamic hor-# D6 Y8 q/ G8 E o) l# ?
monal deficiencies (17) .% l/ g) G0 F+ a* {
The timing for measurement of testosterone in new-
" E: \' Q' N+ O0 a8 Q. m, e" kborns is highly variable but, generally, during the first 2
& u8 m: F# w: M$ B& J: eweeks of life (18) . In our study, serum testosterone level) ~% O* ?- V+ R+ M: w2 T7 U9 W
was measured in all newborns on day 1 in order to fix a0 T- X( `4 Y/ N$ t7 G5 n
time for sample withdrawal in all newborns and, also, to
3 V2 {# D; f: T- c( O$ I0 |make sure that all samples were withdrawn before mothers$ M X1 z$ E+ \9 @/ h
were discharged from the maternity hospital. We found a4 R6 Q8 c- t& g
linear relationship between penile length and testosterone# J/ D4 Y5 ?8 N
levels of newborns. Mean penile length was lower in neo-* X' F4 C1 M$ g$ G5 e
nates exposed to EDs compared to the non-exposed group,
5 e% h7 i2 c* u$ D; Zwhich could be related to the lower testosterone levels in1 s6 S0 `! ^/ ~9 M; G
the exposed group. The etiology of testicular dysgenesis
/ E. W, Z% E- {' Hsyndrome (TDS) is suspected to be related to genetic and/or
' d7 M6 i: ^6 ]1 ^. G: denvironmental factors, including EDs. Few human studies# z4 {1 O3 o1 x. Z
have found associations/correlations between EDs, includ-" [) u( {: K4 n- ]# y
ing phthalates, and the different TDS components (18) .
! \1 W9 [4 R9 D# s( m/ ?Some reports have suggested an increase in hypo-
* ?9 k- Z- @* P3 yspadias rates during the period 1960 – 1990 in European
: ~5 X, j3 Z) z1 o- yand US registries (19 – 23) . There are large geographical
0 y$ C' S/ G* N5 O7 {9 U( i+ vdifferences in reported hypospadias rates, ranging from. b, k/ p" U1 W3 {) n# g) C; q
2.0 to 39.7/10,000 live births (23 – 25) . Several explanations4 Q* f' C; E. ^3 ?6 v) I
have been proposed for the increasing trends and geo-" W9 C( R6 e1 R3 W
graphical differences. As male sexual differentiation is& E: C/ q+ d% S+ A( a; `
critically dependent on normal androgen concentrations,* { p6 G; E5 a0 k+ p
increased exposure to environmental factors affecting6 b1 z0 g# m( X( \! d) ~
androgen homeostasis during fetal life (e.g., EDs with1 Y7 r3 V: K, G! A1 l
estrogenic or anti-androgenic properties) may cause
7 `* e9 r8 ?5 ?, s. T/ ~7 ~hypospadias (3, 4) .* x1 @$ S8 Y/ F% s
In Western Australia, the average prevalence of hypo-
% y K& Q% r( b, z$ w! Espadias in male infants was 67.7 per 10,000 male births.
$ m' f; x- J9 MWhen applying the EUROCAT definition (24), the average
# g. N9 C8 i F1 ^prevalence of hypospadias during 1980 – 2000 was 21.8 per$ Y' I* F, q" ] y- d
10,000 births and the average annual prevalence increased% s# q2 ^1 K' U) O
significantly over the study period by 2.2 % per year. The
d$ p' q. O* }" ~, p6 |6 Dprevalence of hypospadias in this study was much higher& @5 @3 E) T# M; q9 Z( N
at 150 per 10,000; by excluding glanular hypospadias, the
2 R$ f2 Y) {% F b: o1 M( kprevalence fell sharply to 10 per 10,000 (26) .
- @5 B% N* `) y8 k: S1 CWe found a higher rate of anomalies among newborns4 R$ a) i% U+ {2 P9 v7 O- Q7 t4 e
exposed to EDs when compared to non-exposed newborns
( U8 f2 ]- S: E/ o(7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ); this raises the issue that environmental
1 D% Z3 m( O: R5 Y( Opollution might play a role in causing these anomalies.' d. I& ~, I5 r" p- @: W
Within the last decade, several epidemiologic studies
( R$ X3 g* d( zhave suggested environmental factors as a possible cause
" b6 C% U% v( J; wfor the observed increased incidence of abnormalities in& U! }+ w- k0 q- O( [/ s
male reproductive health (27) . Parental environmental/" g$ \3 Z1 Y- S" f* h
occupational exposure to EDs before/during pregnancy
" F, l1 L& B; K e, |8 Mindicates that fetal contamination may be a risk factor for
/ z$ _0 _( m2 F6 z3 G, _1 Zthe development of male external genital malformation
7 \$ H2 W' L" T) f+ W(27 – 29) .
6 T; }3 }& Y, |" h6 }8 JReceived October 25, 2012; accepted January 27, 2013; previously2 T( u/ i& ?! } e
published online March 18, 2013& ~+ @# j9 D* t
References
& I. ~4 K x1 S3 D: r$ O' P9 g1. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J
" u2 x: ~, W& e+ }Urol 1994;152:4 – 14.$ n- w6 {4 n' q5 @: z. d5 t; G
2. Gabrich PN, Vasconcelos JS, Dami ã o R, Silva EA. Penile anthro-
- V. ~. ]- u4 |6 L- }9 Qpometry in Brazilian children and adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J)
! }) B F% u7 G' P3 A% v6 f, v- I2007;83:441 – 6.0 g5 a7 D; s8 B0 e0 o7 S
3. Sultan C, Balaguer P, Terouanne B, Georget V, Paris F, et al.
7 l5 I0 Z; ^8 T dEnvironmental xenoestrogens, antiandrogens and disorders of% g$ z0 P( ]' G! i! [
male sexual differentiation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2001;10:178:6 w k D2 F5 F
99 – 105.
. e* s4 }3 L/ |) \2 ]& A- q4. Sharpe RM, Skakkeb æ k NE. Are oestrogens involved in falling& L2 ~& o0 \ ~' V: T6 j5 O
sperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract ?! ^! K% g+ \( w& x3 S& O& S
Lancet 1993;341:1392 – 5., e1 X4 t9 [" E7 H
5. Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: a new
3 f+ }6 w! R* X, ]. M! x6 Uand emerging public health problem ? Arch Dis Child 2006;91:
2 e6 f9 P; ^/ k! k4 u- ^633 – 41.4 q" |1 m! g8 n) M0 m, |
6. Joensen UN, J ø rgensen N, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Skakkebaek NE.
0 R' }2 Q/ k/ b7 j9 i4 L3 |Testicular dysgenesis syndrome and Leydig cell function. Basic
* l# z& y2 X t" ~- J: GClin Pharmacol Toxicol 2008;102:155 – 61.
5 g8 V, L' I) V; U7. IEH. Chemicals purported to be endocrine disruptors: a6 B; G, u @4 g- J3 B% s
compilation of published lists. (Web Report W20), Leicester,0 [5 z+ ~. d- z; @2 I7 p4 r
UK: MRC Institute for Environmental Health, 2005. Accessed on7 Z+ ?0 R) }; D1 F& [
March 2005. Available at http://www.le.ac.uk/ieh/.! ~: \3 s) P3 x. e6 Y% M) h
8. Cheng PK, Chanoine JP. Should the definition of micropenis vary
8 ?9 r# p- o+ Y, z- v* gaccording to ethnicity ? Horm Res 2001;55:278 – 81.2 U$ g4 P; X0 i# X0 Y- R
Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco2 a3 ]" S1 E+ S; q2 j
Authenticated
1 k) c( J9 F8 m, f8 tDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM1 r5 I( q5 b9 Y/ P8 y
El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 513
% F. ]2 E6 W) q$ n. m21. K ä ll é n B, Bertollini R, Castilla E, Czeizel A, Knudsen LB, et al. B; x2 z @7 ?8 g% a& g5 t3 l! q
A joint international study on the epidemiology of hypospadias.2 H* @" n" C4 B3 h$ i
Acta Paediatr Scand 1986;324(Suppl):1 – 52.
. R+ k. [. p! g22. Paulozzi LJ, Erickson JD, Jackson RJ. Hypospadias trends in two9 P) m- x6 V9 W7 e
US surveillance systems. Pediatrics 1997;100:831 – 4.
7 j* e( |/ I7 Bpenile length in newborn and infants. BJU Int 1999;84 : 1093 – 4.
7 S; T% z- i" ^5 UJ Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000;13 : 55 – 62.8 h9 U6 K6 ]# R! L6 h; o
Vasudevan G, Manivarmane B, Bhat BV, Bhatia BD, Kumar S.4 ~1 _: o l% P, P. B: p4 f5 q
Genital standards for south Indian male newborns. Indian J
( B$ r" c3 P B9. Scorer CG. The incidence of incomplete descent of the testicle at* t2 w& S ^. M( h/ Y
birth. Arch Dis Child 1956;31:198 – 202.) v% z( y% B, ^8 C4 c
10. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health
$ c* S$ r( A x9 I2 l3 f$ D& `# Csciences, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1995.6 L9 b4 X) f4 I( d
11. Flatau E, Josefsberg Z, Reisner SH, Bialik O, Iaron Z. Letter:# ~2 K0 A* c# @7 ~9 l5 T: v2 m
penile size in the newborn infants. J Pediatr 1975;87:663 – 4.
" }! y) f3 b! O& A12. Ozbey H, Temiz A, Salman T. A simple method for measuring
9 _- a) Q6 v6 y. W* h: N13. Al-Herbish AS. Standard penile size for normal full term: A) U" H5 M# d _3 [/ K* |: ?3 ~6 M
newborns in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2002;23:314 – 6.
! O6 ]9 H5 d4 u# n; N9 r! x) o14. Lian WB, Lee WR, Ho LY. Penile length of newborns in Singapore.1 p @! V9 m9 l+ E: @6 x
15. Pediatr 1995;62:593 – 6. e6 c7 S+ J7 g" l K
16. Boas M, Boisen KA, Virtanen HE, Kaleva M, Suomi AM, et al.; j$ Q* o$ E, E" X9 b* C2 {" ?& h
Postnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum
3 D0 ^4 A' K, x: T8 x) ftestosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys.8 e: B. O" O% B" N3 ~
Eur J Endocrinol 2006;154:125 – 9.
) T" T8 ~) T9 `8 S9 @* e17. Camurdan AD, Oz MO, Ilhan MN, Camurdan OM, Sahin F,+ j- e: _/ V! i
et al. Current stretched penile length: cross-sectional study
+ b1 N+ Y* z' `; p2 eof 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years. Urology& `( [7 H- e0 R8 S: m8 T& j
2007;70:572 – 5.
2 K' \/ }: C$ j1 B- f$ L8 X' ?" c18. Bay K, Asklund C, Skakkebaek NE, Andersson AM. Testicular v9 x Q/ F' |* l9 \# {( e9 G
dysgenesis syndrome: possible role of endocrine disruptors.2 O) ?1 \# u! `; l% \) ^' _; P( f
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;20:77 – 90.
4 |: i& ]6 O S, P7 e; K0 a19. Czeizel A. Increasing trends in congenital malformations of male5 S. M {* I# h; }8 U& i' r
external genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:462 – 3.0 ~/ P: v# g- `) G& H6 @
20. Matlai P, Beral V. Trends in congenital malformations of external" e% j* }% v7 n& V' z, ^# h" S' _
genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:108.4 A6 f2 O5 q9 n; ?$ H2 q; k
23. Paulozzi LJ. International trends in rates of hypospadias9 ?2 j" @ l; b* r4 W- Z2 D
and cryptorchidism. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:8 r6 ]) I& F9 x0 L' _
297 – 302.
l4 V& _/ D5 [! x" N9 O; i! x24. EUROCAT Working Group. EUROCAT report 7. 15 years of
4 ^5 s7 x4 ^& R i- n2 tsurveillance of congenital anomalies in Europe 1980 – 1994.9 H9 Q8 t& s2 r( M# a) W3 z) z; S+ v
Brussels, Belgium: Scientific Institute of Public Health-Louis) K8 ]# l e$ u7 {
Pasteur, 1997.
3 I2 w# _) H( g: }6 A( H+ E+ _25. Toppari J, Kaleva M, Virtanen HE. Trends in the incidence
4 j6 }' S8 x1 a; d3 Aof cryptorchidism and hypospadias, and methodological" m7 Y; Z& a" W8 n/ g j/ I# S3 `0 j
limitations of registry-based data. Hum Reprod Update4 j- c6 n$ A4 P9 r& X6 h
2001;7:282 – 6.# x5 m. u9 x5 @1 V2 S
26. Nassar N, Bower C, Barker A. Increasing prevalence of$ H+ C) v% A4 w8 U9 c5 J) h+ X
hypospadias in Western Australia, 1980 – 2000. Arch Dis Child
! w$ D5 [* \5 u% K; F2007;92:580 – 4.+ d g7 g* ]" n* j/ j3 D
27. Wang MH, Baskin LS. Endocrine disruptors, genital" I! K7 f! _' w
development, and hypospadias. J Androl 2008;29:499 – 505.
) H* y4 E# j, V1 M' l/ u28. Morales-Su á rez-Varela MM, Toft GV, Jensen MS, Ramlau-Hansen
/ B& l' Q* Q- c# {# r H9 Q/ R) q XC, Linda Kaerlev L, et al. Parental occupational exposure to
0 A' ^% }8 @3 R' {) x7 s# Uendocrine disrupting chemicals and male genital malfor-
, r8 N4 L- ~) G4 @) W x' A% f7 |mations: a study in the Danish National Birth Cohort Study.
+ |+ y8 ^4 Q' @3 PEnviron Health 2011;10:3.. M8 H$ c, i* t( q2 a
29. Gaspari L, Sampaio DR, Paris F, Audran F, Orsini M, et al. High9 B4 G6 s; d+ g$ r; ~
prevalence of micropenis in 2710 male newborns from an
/ y5 {6 c- ~0 P8 E) {intensive-use pesticide area of Northeastern Brazil. Int J Androl' x( c% e! P* O; c0 R% R
2012;35:253 – 64. |
|